Investment Strategy Profiles

View All Model Strategies

Asset Allocation 2-2: Dynamic S&P 500 & Fixed Income (2 ETF) Combination Strategy


Asset Allocation 2-2: S&P 500 & Fixed Income (2 ETF) Strategy



Most recent page update: Sunday, June 17, 2018


This Strategy Profile page provides you with an introduction to the "Asset Allocation 2-2: Dynamic S&P 500 & Fixed Income (2 ETF) Combination Strategy," including details of its investment approach, the makeup of the universe of ETFs from which it chooses, the drivers of its performance, documentation of historical performance, and an explanation of its impressive features and benefits. If you have any questions about this – or any of our other strategies, please contact us for assistance.



Our "Asset Allocation 2-2: Dynamic S&P 500-Bull/Bear & Fixed Income (2 ETF) Combo Strategy" dynamically combines the optimum S&P 500-based ETF asset (of five) and the optimum Fixed Income-based ETF asset (of 53) to comprise a robust, high-return, low-volatility, two-ETF Asset Allocation portfolio that will consistently provide you with substantial returns in all market conditions.

The two ETFs, one from each asset class (S&P 500-based and Fixed Income), are held at all times. Sophisticated, state-of-the-art algorithms analyze as many as 28 different data sets and each week, always selecting the two optimum ETFs for conditions. This combination makes for a stress-free investment portfolio that skips all the drama surrounding recessions and market crashes and consistently turns market declines into substantial upside performance.

The two ETF components in this strategy, S&P 500-based and Fixed Income, have a weighting of 70% and 30%, respectively, with the most weight on the S&P 500-equity component. This weighting combination provides the highest Risk-Adjusted Return with the lowest Maximum Drawdown. This combination makes for an anxiety-free investment portfolio that serves you exceptionally well, year-in and year-out, regardless of the various escapades going on in the world around us.

Our Short Name for this Strategy is  "Asset Allocation-2-2"  or  "AA-2-2"

Outstanding Performance in Both Bull and Bear Markets

Our Asset Allocation 2-2: Dynamic S&P 500 & Fixed Income (2 ETF) Combo Strategy (or AA-2-2 for short) combines two asset classes, one from one of our high-performance strategies (the S&P 500 Bull/Bear (1 ETF) Strategy), and one from our most conservative strategy (the Adaptive Fixed Income (1 ETF) Strategy) to comprise a single, high-return, uncorrelated 2-Asset, 2-ETF model. This Asset Allocation strategy features consistent upside performance regardless of market conditions and consistent profits – even when stocks are declining. Easy to trade with just two positions and, on average, two months between transactions, subscribers are rewarded with many significant benefits.

Equity Curve

A smooth, steadily climbing performance chart: As you can see from this chart that runs from inception on July 1, 2006-to-Present, the Asset Allocation 2-2: Optimal S&P 500 & Fixed Income Strategy provides a steady and consistent upward climb in its equity curve.  The AA-2-2 Strategy's performance is shown with the red line while the benchmark, a 70-30 combination of the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and the Total Bond Market ETF (BND) is shown by a blue line.




PERFORMANCE - SINCE INCEPTION (July 1, 2006 - Present)

Asset Allocation 2-2: Dynamic S&P 500 & Fixed Income Combination

The blue line shown as the benchmark is a buy-and-hold of the S&P 500 (large-cap) ETF (SPY).
The red line shows the Adaptive Equity Rotation (2 ETF) Strategy's performance since inception.

Note: Since the chart above is not logarithmic, recent volatility will appear more significant than past volatility – even if it is actually less.
Observe the lower window to compare periods of volatility.


Make This Performance Yours - Subscribe Now!


The advantage of running two uncorrelated strategies in an Asset Allocation model is that by combining the two, we benefit from a drop in volatility and improved risk-adjusted returns. This strategy provides the best Sharpe Ratio (a measure of risk-adjusted return) of all our strategies, at 1.56. Its Sortino Ratio (another measure of risk-adjusted return that focuses on downside volatility) is a whopping 2.22 - the second-highest of our strategies (behind our very conservative Fixed Income Strategy).

With a compound annual growth rate of just below 27%, this two-asset combination strategy nearly quadruples (387%-times) the average return of the benchmark S&P 500 index (6.96%) and on average, outperforms 99.7% of mutual funds in the last 10 years. Since inception in July, 2006, this strategy has outperformed its S&P 500 benchmark every year, and has never experienced a money-losing year.



Inception: July 1, 2006
Rebalance Frequency: Weekly
Average Hold Time: 39.4 business days (about 2 months)
Annualized Return: 26.79%
Max Drawdown:
Financial Crisis Return
(Dec.'07-Mar.'09): 65.61%
2017 Return: 30.14%
2017 Max Drawdown: -2.94%
Sharpe Ratio (risk-adjusted return): 1.56
Sortino Ratio (risk-adjusted return): 2.22



The Performance Difference in Dollars

As an example of the return difference between the strategy and its benchmark - a combination of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) with the Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) – in a 70%-30% combination. This benchmark , one which millions of investors are using for their primary savings, provides an annual return of just 7.74% in the last 20 years.

However, by owning the optimal S&P 500-based ETF (of five) at any given time, combined with the optimal fixed-income ETF (of 53) at any given time, you could receive an annual return of 26.79% – which is 3.46 times (346%) times the annual return of the benchmark!

The financial implications of that difference is phenomenal. For example, $100,000 placed in the buy-and-hold combination of the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and the total bond market ETF (BND) - i.e., thebenchmark, you would have $444,159 after 20 years. In comparison, that same $100,000 invested using our AA-2-2: S&P 500 / Fixed Income Strategy, in the same 70%-30% combination, would be worth $11,526,568 after 20 years – yes, that's more than eleven million dollars – a phenomenal 26-times the return you would have received over the same 20 years if using the benchmark (SPY/BND 70-30) combination without our signals service.

If you are just starting your career and are planning to save for retirement or financial freedom, this article shows how an average person can attain $484 million or retire 20 years early when using an ETFOptimize investment strategy. We even provide an interactive calculator for you to determine how much you can attain over time with our simple to use ETF-based signals servive.

We're pleased to inform you that this service is available to you now – provided by our Asset Allocation: Optimum S&P 500 & Fixed-Income (2 ETF) Strategy. Each day you put off and getting started with this service is a day in which you will not be compounding your savings at such a high rate.

Get this return - Subscribe Now!


Turning Losses Into Gains

Outperformance is nothing if it isn't accompanied by downside protection when the market begins to slide. After all, who wants a very aggressive investment that produces a credible performance when the market is rising – but loses it all (and perhaps more) when conditions turn negative? Fortunately, both of the components of this strategy provide ample protection from loss when the market is declining. As a stand-alone strategies, neither has lost money in any year and the S&P 500 component significantly outperforms the market. First of all, neither the S&P 500 component nor the Fixed Income component has ever lost money during any year when operated separately, as stand-alone single-ETF strategies, and they provide an even more robust investment approach when the two are combined into this Asset Allocation 2-Asset, 2-ETF strategy.

When confronted with challenging economic or market conditions that cause the typical stock portfolio or mutual fund to go into decline, this strategy's S&P-500-based component first switches to a 'risk-off' asset, in the form of the iShares 1-3 Year Treasury ETF (SHY), then to an inverse ETF - the ProShares -1x Short S&P 500 ETF (SH). If underlying conditions continue to deteriorate, the strategy will switch to the ProShares -2x UltraShort S&P 500 ETF (SDS) to make profits as the market declines. Meanwhile, the Fixed Income asset is always rotating to the fixed income ETF that is optimum for conditions.

Performance During the Financial Crisis

As an example of how this strategy transforms losses into gains, the best example we can provide is during the Financial Crisis, when the S&P 500 plummeted from late 2007, through all of 2008, and into the first quarter of 2009, losing -56% of its value. During this same period, our AA-2-2 Strategy's nearest benchmark, a 70/30 S&P 500/Total Bond combination (SPY/BND) lost -40% – less than the S&P 500 because it is a combination of two uncorrelated asset classes (an advantage our strategy also puts to use). Meanwhile, our Asset Allocation-2-2 Strategy consistently switched to the two optimum ETFs four all conditions, and outperformed its benchmark by huge margins.

These performances are shown in Chart A below (left side) which presents the developments from the December 10, 2007 high until the Financial Crisis nadir on March 9, 2009. The strategy produces an outperformance of 105% through the low of the Financial Crisis.

On the right side, Chart B below shows the strategy's performance from the December 2007 high, through the Financial Crisis low in March 2009, and progresses until some three years later when the benchmark finally recovers its -40% loss during the Crisis. By the time the SPY/BND 70-30 benchmark gets back to breakeven (0%), our Asset Allocation 2-2 Strategy would have produced a return of 150% for you!


  Financial Prices -  until benchmark recovered losses

Financial Crisis Nadir: From the December 2007 high just before the Financial Crisis to its low on March 9, 2009, this strategy's benchmark, a 70/30-weighted S&P 500/Total Bond Market ETF (SPY/BND) Combination lost -39.63%. In fact, it lost less than the S&P 500 itself (-56%) because of its combination of two uncorrelated asset classes. However, during the same period, our Asset Allocation 2-2 Optimal S&P 500-multi/Optimal Fixed Income (2 ETF) Strategy produced an exceptional return of 65% - a 105% outperformance!

  Financial Crisis & Recovery: As shown by the chart to the left, this strategy's benchmark (a 70/30-weighted S&P 500/Total Bond Market ETF (SPY/BND) combination) descended from its December 2007 high (just before the Financial Crisis) through its low on March 9, 2009, it lost -40%. Then, as shown in the chart above, the benchmark began to gain ground and over a total of 36.5 months (until January 1, 2011) it finally recovered that -40% loss. However, during that same timeframe, our Asset Allocation 2-2 Dynamic S&P 500/ Fixed Income (2 ETF) Strategy produced a return of 150%!  Which investment would you prefer to use?


The AA-2-2 Strategy, instead of declining for 18 months as the vast majority of stocks did during worst stock market selloff in a generation, instead was gaining ground during that entire time, as you can see by the chart on the left, above. As shown by the chart on the right, you would have avoided that entire selloff and continue to make money (and a 149.9% return) for 36.5 months as this strategy's benchmark was just getting back to breakeven.

1) Eliminating significant market declines is the first of several ways this ETFOptimize strategy produces significant outperformance. By minimizing or eliminating drawdowns, as shown by the chart above left, with this strategy you can eliminate the many months or years required to recover your losses caused by regular declines. Eliminating all that time required just to get back to 0% would be an enormous advantage. However, this ETFOptimize strategy goes even further – in two additional important ways:

2) It makes money even as the S&P 500 is declining. By dynamically switching to an S&P 500 inverse ETF (SH) when economic and market conditions are significantly unfavorable – or to the 2x-leveraged S&P 500 Inverse ETF (SDS) when conditions are dramatically negative, this strategy produces significant gains as S&P 500 stocks decline.

3) In the opposite direction, when the S&P 500 is rising and economic and market conditions are highly favorable, this strategy will switch to a 2x-leveraged long S&P 500 ETF (SSO), thereby doubling the return of the market whenever robust rallies take place.







Consistent Annual Profit and Outperformance

As millions of other investors and their advisors become concerned about the regular weakening of economic indicators or a directionless market, not knowing what the future holds and if the market is about to fall off a cliff, subscribers to the Asset Allocation 2-2 Combo Strategy can simply ignore all that noise. The AA-2-2 strategy assesses as many as 28 different data sets each weekend and determines the optimum ETF to own for any type of condition that can affect the market (referring to both common stocks, precious metals, and fixed income assets).

Our Asset Allocation 2-2 Combo Strategy provides subscribers with profits every single year, regardless of the performance of the economy or the stock market. This may be the most impressive benefit of all for those who lived through the Financial Crisis of 2008-2009 and lost a substantial amount of money (or felt the intense stress of a potential loss): i.e., the AA-2-2 Strategy has never experienced a money-losing year!  Furthermore, the strategy has outperformed its benchmark every single year since inception.

The charts below provide both a numeric and a bar chart presentation of the annual performance of the AA-2-2 Strategy since its inception in 2006.

The 'Performance by Calendar Year' chart below shows...

• this model's annual performance on the top line,
• the performance of the benchmark in the middle line, and the
• the 'excess' performance or outperformance of this strategy over its benchmark on the bottom line.


The 'Yearly Returns' bar chart below shows a graphical interpretation of the data above. Notice from the strategy's performance bars (red) that it has been profitable every year (indicated by all red bars being above 0%), and in every year, the strategy (red bars) outperformed its benchmark (indicated by red bars being above the blue bars), most years significantly. Of course, 2018 is still underway and we're confident that, by the end of the year, it will show the same profitability and outperformance characteristics as all the other years.

The Asset Allocation 2-2 Strategy's annual performance is shown by red bars and its benchmark return is shown by blue bars.


Demonstrated graphically by the bottom window and numerically by the top window, you can see that the AA-2-2 Strategy has been profitable every year since its inception (indicated by red bars above 0%), and it also outperformed its benchmark every year (indicated by red bars extending above blue bars).

The outperformance was fractional in 2006 and 2007, but very significant in 2008 (outperformance of 52.16%), 2009 (29.34%), and in 2013 when the strategy produced a gain that was 34.89% more than its benchmark.

While 2018 is not yet showing those same characteristics, we are confident that by the end of the year it will. Following the very significant run-up from late-2016 through 2017, the market has experienced a very long consolidation through the first half of 2018. We expect that consolidation to end soon and this strategy will begin outperforming, as always. However, subscribers to this approach should be aware that in long, sideways consolidations of the S&P 500, since its primary performance drivers are focusing on the S&P 500, this strategy has no clear way to produce gains. However, you should also keep in mind that the 2018 consolidation of more than six months is extremely unusual.


To Attain This Same Performance - Subscribe Today!




Based on Monthly Data
One of the most important measures of an investment approach is its 'Risk-Adjusted Return,' which we usually assess from the Sharpe Ratio or the Sortino Ratio. These metrics show the ratio of an investment's performance to its volatility (aka, 'risk'). Notice the dramatic outperformance of this strategy when those two ratios are compared to the strategy's benchmark - the buy-and-hold of a 70%-30% weighted SPY/BND ETF combo. Since the inception of this strategy, the Sharp Ratio of the SPY/BND benchmark is 0.71 while its Sortino Ratio is 0.91 – compared to ratios of 1.56 and 2.22 for this strategy. You can also see from the last entry at the bottom of the table showing Alpha % (average annual outperformance of an investment above the performance of its benchmark) that this strategy outperforms its benchmark by an average of more than 20% per year. The actual, year-by-year outperformance is shown in the "Performance by Calendar Year" table (above).

Risk Measurements



Strategy Universes

This two-component Asset Allocation strategy combines our S&P 500 Bull/Bear (1 ETF) Strategy and our Adaptive Fixed Income (1 ETF) Strategy. Combining the two strategies with a weighting of 70-30Each component has a separate universe with five ETFs in the S&P 500 universe and 53 ETFs in the Fixed-Income universe. We make sure that each ETF in each universe have ample daily volume to accommodate individual investors with a fairly large portfolio of up to $20 million. If you are investing more than $20-$30 million or more in any one ETF transaction, or are an investment advisor, please contact us for additional information.


The Dynamic S&P 500 Bull/Bear Component selects from a five-ETF universe that consists of the following assets:
• ProShares Ultra (2x) S&P 500 ETF (SSO) - 2x-leveraged for robustly bullish conditions
• SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) - Tracks the S&P 500 index during bullish conditions (no leverage)
• iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) - risk-off/flat for sideways and unpredictable conditions
• ProShares Short (-1x) S&P 500 ETF
(SH) -  inverse ETF ( tracks the opposite of the S&P 500 index) for bearish conditions
ProShares UltraShort (-2x)
S&P 500 ETF (SDS) -  2x inverse for robustly bearish conditions

Note: Because they are so widely traded, the S&P 500-component ETFs can accomodate virtually any size of investment.


The Adaptive Fixed Income Component selects from a 53-ETF universe consisting of bond ETFs, Treasury ETFs, and other fixed-income ETF assets.

The tickers for the 53 fixed income ETFs are as follows:



We Guarantee You'll Be Pleased with Your Strategy Subscription!

We are so confident you'll be satisfied with the performance of your ETFOptimize investment strategy that we back your subscription with a 60-day, 100% Money-Back Guarantee. If you're not completely delighted with your subscription for any reason in the first 60 days, just let us know, and we'll promptly refund every penny of your subscription price. No questions asked.

Since 2004, we have held an A+ Rating with the Better Business Bureau and have not had a single complaint since the company's launch in 1998. Our corporate mission is to build a tremendous group of enthusiastic customer-advocates who consistently achieve their wealth-building goals using the ETFOptimize investment strategies. Why not join the thousands who have already taken advantage of these unique strategies? There's zero risk to you – the burden is entirely on us to provide you with the incredible benefits you read about in these pages.

By subscribing, you acknowledge that you have read and agree to the ETFOptimize Terms and Conditions.  Your account is billed as "Optimized Investments, Inc." 
Satisfaction guarantee applies to the first 60-day period after your paid subscription begins. 
All rights reserved, Copyright © 1998 ,



Make This Strategy Your Own!  Subscribe Today